Anel, when configuring netcdf-c, this is unusual. Why are you enabling one
without the other? Is this intentional?
*--enable-netcdf4 --disable-hdf5*
> Error: Symbol 'nc_noquantize' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
This is probably a bug in one of the configure steps. If you don't mind
installing an extra library, then the easiest workaround for now is
probably to add the HDF5 library, and switch to *--enable-hdf5* when
configuring netcdf-c.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 2:14 AM Anel Hernandez <anel20002000@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> in Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS, 64bits. I try to install netcdf With these flags:
>
> export DIR=$(pwd)
> export PATH=$DIR/netcdf/bin:${PATH}
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$DIR/netcdf/lib:$DIR/grib2/lib
>
> export JASPERLIB=$DIR/grib2/lib
> export JASPERINC=$DIR/grib2/include
> export NETCDF=$DIR/netcdf
>
> export CC=gcc
> export CXX=g++
> export FC=gfortran
> export FCFLAGS="-m64"
> export F77=gfortran
> export FFLAGS="-m64"
>
> export LDFLAGS="-L$DIR/netcdf/lib -L$DIR/grib2/lib"
> export CPPFLAGS="-I$DIR/netcdf/include -I$DIR/grib2/include"
>
> and this code:
> ##############################Install NETCDF C
> Library############################
> tar -xf netcdf-c-4.9.2.tar.gz
> cd netcdf-c-4.9.2
> ./configure --prefix=$DIR/netcdf --enable-shared --enable-netcdf4
> --disable-filter-testing --disable-dap --disable-hdf5
> make -j 4
> make install
> cd ..
> rm -r netcdf-c-4.9.2
> ##############################NetCDF fortran
> library############################
> export LIBS="-lnetcdf -lz"
> tar -xf netcdf-fortran-4.6.1.tar.gz
> cd netcdf-fortran-4.6.1
> ./configure --enable-shared --prefix=$DIR/netcdf
> make -j 4
> make install
> cd ..
> rm -r netcdf-fortran-4.6.1
>
> I got this error:
> module_netcdf_nf_data.F90:167:54:
>
> 167 | Integer, Parameter :: NF_NOQUANTIZE = NC_NOQUANTIZE
> | 1
> Error: Symbol 'nc_noquantize' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type; did you mean
> 'nf_noquantize'?
> module_netcdf_nf_data.F90:168:67:
>
> 168 | Integer, Parameter :: NF_QUANTIZE_BITGROOM = NC_QUANTIZE_BITGROOM
> | 1
> Error: Symbol 'nc_quantize_bitgroom' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type; did you
> mean 'nf_quantize_bitgroom'?
>
> What should I do?
>
> thanks in advance,
> A
> Gracias de antemano por su comprensión y cooperación,
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Saludos,
> Prof & Dr. Anel Hernández Garces
>
