You really have to use the rich, chocolaty netCDF-4 instead of vanilla HDF5 for earth science data. Here's why.
[Read More]27 July 2012
You really have to use the rich, chocolaty netCDF-4 instead of vanilla HDF5 for earth science data. Here's why.
[Read More]An Essay on Domain Specific Models
05 May 2012
It is often the case that a domain specific model is implemented by providing an API that in turn is implemented with respect to some underlying, more generic data model. Again, CDM is an example, where the Coordinate System and Scientific Feature Type models are implemented using the underlying CDM Data Access Layer model.
DAP4 also provides a good, generic model capable of supporting domain specific models. In fact, it should be possible to implement the equivalent of the CDM Coordinate System and Scientific Feature Type models on top of DAP4.
Figure 1 shows a notional architecture for using DAP4 as the basis for domain specific modeling.
The client is given an API supporting a domain specific model. It is assumed here that an instance of the domain model meta-data is represented as a traversable abstract syntax tree. So, the model API would provide the following operations.
The domain-specific library implementing the API would be responsible for making requests to the server for information. Those requests would indicate to the server the domain model being used as well as the dataset being requested.
The reply from the server would be in the form of a DAP4 DDX and data with annotations (i.e. attributes and extra variables) sufficient to allow the client-side domain model library to convert the returned information to the domain model for presentation to the client.
The server side operation is similar. It is assumed that request from a client contains sufficient identifying information to allow the server (a servlet server such as Tomcat) to forward the request to the servlet capable of interpreting such a domain specific model request.
The domain specific model servlet is capable of translating the dataset into DAP4 as the reply to the client's request. As expected by the client, the reply is annotated with sufficient information to allow the generic DAP4 reply to be converted to the domain specific model.
Dennis Heimbigner
25 April 2012
Unidata Users Committee GRIB recommendations for WMO consideration
25 April 2012
06 September 2011
Many GRIB writers are not versioning their files in ways that allow generic readers to find the correct tables. Tales of mystery and mayhem.
[Read More]