Gilbert - looks good so far (frames out of sequence would show as missing
frames as the count would jump):
Ground Station #1, reset yesterday after talking to NOAA
PID TotalFrames MissingFrames TotalProducts MissingProducts
Retransmits
NMC 13084773 0 2165069 0
26055
NMC2 37472243 0 1714826 0
11434
NOPT 1061621 0 793799 0
3820
NPP 1351354 0 4895 0
36
ADD 10659491 0 71005 0
0
EXP 9885367 0 43946 0
0
GRW 9406073 0 129225 0
0
GRE 9914814 0 128195 0
0
NWWS 87187 0 29572 0
0
*Prague*
Ground Station #2, reset yesterday after talking to NOAA
PID TotalFrames MissingFrames TotalProducts MissingProducts
Retransmits
NMC 13073381 0 2162899 0
26054
NMC2 37418946 0 1700736 0
11434
NOPT 1060838 0 793016 0
3820
NPP 1345224 0 4889 0
34
ADD 10659484 5 71003 0
0
EXP 9866764 0 43910 0
0
GRW 9386903 0 129093 0
0
GRE 9887961 0 128055 0
0
NWWS 87080 0 29554 0
0
*Stonie Cooper, PhD*
Software Engineer III
NSF Unidata Program Center
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
*I acknowledge that the land I live and work on is the traditional home of
The **Chahiksichahiks (**Pawnee), The **Umoⁿhoⁿ (**Omaha), and The **Jiwere
(**Otoe).*
*"There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where
decades happen" *
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:04 AM Sebenste, Gilbert <sebensteg@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
> A follow-up to this. The duplicate product count is due to “keep alive”
> messages being sent across numerous NWS interfaces. This has or will be
> taken care of. Otherwise,
> I haven’t lost any packets, nor do any appear out of order now. Stonie,
> can you verify this on your end?
>
>
>
> Gilbert Sebenste
>
> Meteorology Support Analyst
>
>
>
> *From:* Gilbert Sebenste <gilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 9, 2024 5:47 PM
> *To:* Sebenste, Gilbert <sebensteg@xxxxxxx>
> *Cc:* NOAAPORT <noaaport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pete Pokrandt via ldm-users <
> ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* [External] Re: [ldm-users] GOES-16 missing tiles, and packets
> arriving out of sequence
>
>
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of COD’s system. Do not click
> links, open attachments, or respond with sensitive information unless you
> recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> Follow-up: They switched to the BNCF at 14:15Z this morning. I i'm not
> seeing missing satellite images, but I am seeing a huge number of
> re-transmits and duplicates that the LDM is rejecting at AllisonHouse and
> COD. A contact I have at NCF emailed me to check on it, and I have given
> him log samples so he can see what's going on.
>
>
>
> Gilbert
>
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2024, at 4:11 PM, Sebenste, Gilbert <sebensteg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Good day everyone,
>
> I am going to try to kill two birds with one stone here.
>
> 1. The GOES-16 missing tiles issue has been resolved when SBN/NOAAport is
> sending their uplink via the ANCF and primary uplink. This problem was due
> to multiple
>
> issues, but they have gotten them taken care of on the NESDIS side of
> things. They had a nagging problem with channel 10, but that has been
> resolved (they had an issue at 14:10 with
>
> a missing tile this morning, but NOAAport was down for 5 minutes while
> they made expected changes to the SBN this morning, and all channels had a
> glitch at that time).
>
>
>
> 2. Additionally, the out-of-sequence packet issue when they are on the
> ANCF has been resolved, and was determined to be an NCF issue.
>
>
> But…
>
> When they are on the BNCF, and transmitting from their alternate uplink
> site, they still experience out-of-sequence packets, numerous missing
> products
>
> that have to be resent (we see a LOT of duplicate products here at COD
> when they are on the BNCF), missing satellite tiles…and even missing
> satellite images.
>
> NCF is aware of the situation. Last week they switched to the BNCF for 3
> hours, and the problems were still there, so they switched back to the
> primary. They are working on it.
>
>
> Gilbert Sebenste
>
> Meteorology Support Analyst
>
>
> <image001.png>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE: All exchanges posted to Unidata maintained email lists are
> recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and made publicly
> available through the web. Users who post to any of the lists we
> maintain are reminded to remove any personal information that they
> do not want to be made public.
>
>
> ldm-users mailing list
> ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE: All exchanges posted to Unidata maintained email lists are
> recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and made publicly
> available through the web. Users who post to any of the lists we
> maintain are reminded to remove any personal information that they
> do not want to be made public.
>
>
> ldm-users mailing list
> ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
